生命伦理学“四原则说”与“允许原则说”比较研究  

Comparative Study of “Four Principles” and “Permission Principle” in Bioethics

作　　者：刘英[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽中医学院医药经济管理学院,安徽合肥230038

出　　处：《湖北文理学院学报》2012年第9期44-48,共5页Journal of Hubei University of Arts and Science

摘　　要：比彻姆和丘卓斯的四原则说和恩格尔哈特的允许原则说是当今生命伦理学界有关原则主义争论的重要关注点。它们在理论基础、理论构建的路径、普适原则的建构方式以及对理性功能的看法上,的确存在着差异;但它们在坚持原则主义、认可普适性原则、承认多元化的道德境遇、珍视生命等方面则是共同的。反思它们的异同,对我国生命伦理学原则的重建和本土化生命伦理学建构具有重要启示。Beauchamp and Childress＇ ＂four principles＂ and Engelhardt＇s ＂permission principle＂ are important theories on the principle of bioethics.There are differences in their theoretical bases,theoretical construct paths,the universal principle construction methods and the rational function views,while they share a lot in common in insisting on their principles,authorizing universality principle,admitting diversified moral situations,cherishing life,etc.Reflecting on their similarities and differences is inspirational to our efforts in rebuilding bioethics and its localization in our country.

关 键 词：四原则说 允许原则说 道德多元化 原则主义 本土生命伦理学 

分 类 号：D82[政治法律—政治学]