“存异”难以“求同”——胡风“五四”观异于主流的歧见及其对胡风命运的影响  

Difference Existed Is Difficult to Obtain Agreement: Hu Feng's View on May 4th Different from the Mainstream and Its Influence on Hu Feng's Doom

作　　者：谢刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学文学院,福建福州350007

出　　处：《中国石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第5期85-90,共6页Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)

基　　金：福建省教育厅项目(JB11045S)

摘　　要：如何看待"五四",是审视胡风思想内质及其与左翼主流分歧的一个关键角度。两者在"五四"总主题的认识上并无差异,而在"五四"领导者的认定及历史意义的阐发上却有不同。胡风认为:经过真切实践的鲁迅在"五四"时期已经成为共产主义知识分子,理当居于"五四"领导者之列,这与权威的"鲁迅转变论"产生龃龉;"五四"的历史意义主要在于文学/文化层面,而非政治范畴,"五四"的反封建传统较之其反帝传统更为根本和重要。这些独异之见动摇了主流意识形态合法性论证的逻辑,是导致胡风悲剧命运的重要祸根。How to look on May 4th is key point that surveys Hu Feng＇s thought and its divergence with Left Wing＇s main thought. Both had no difference on cognition of main thesis of May 4th but difference on leader and historical significance of May 4th, Hu Feng argued that Lu Xun had become communist through personal experience in May 4th period and should become a leader of May 4th. The view had discord with authoritative conclusion about Lu Xun change. Hu Feng thought that historical significance of May 4th focused on literature or culture not on political category and anti-feudalism was more fundamental and important than anti-imperialism tradition. These unique views shook demonstrative logic of legitimacy of the mainstream ideology, which led to Hu Feng＇s tragic doom.

关 键 词：胡风 “五四”观 主流 反封建 悲剧命运 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]