检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王荣品[1] 唐雷[1] 刘昌杰[1] 邓奇平[1] 顾福嘉[1] 王楠竹[1] 王涛[1] 王玉权[1]
出 处:《实用放射学杂志》2012年第10期1525-1529,共5页Journal of Practical Radiology
基 金:基金项目:贵州省社会发展攻关项目(黔科合SY字[2011]3057号);贵州省卫生厅基金资助项目(gzwkj2009-1-004).
摘 要:目的探讨双源CT肺动脉造影(cTPA)对肺段和亚段肺动脉栓塞(PE)的诊断价值。方法对临床疑诊PE患者行CTPA,对14例首诊外周PE及15例首诊阴性的患者进行回顾性分析,由2位心血管病影像诊断医师在后处理工作站独立对原始薄层图像进行多平面重组(MPR)和最大密度投影法重组(MIP)以观察栓子分布情况。根据诊断标准,对肺段、亚段动脉的检出及栓子评价按节段记录为阳性、阴性、可疑及未显示。采用配对计数X2检验及k系数检验分析两者的诊断差异及吻合度。结果15例首诊阴性的患者再次检出2例外周PE,16例外周PE均能清楚显示肺段动脉,对亚段肺动脉显示率为90.39%。2位医师对肺段和亚段动脉栓子检出评价差异无统计学意义(X2=0.333和3.325,P均〉0.05),对段和亚段动脉栓子等级评价具有较好的吻合度(k=0.92和k=0.81)。结论双源CTPA能清楚地显示外周肺动脉,不同观察者对外周PE的诊断评价具有较好一致性,因而对外周PE具有较好的诊断价值。Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value in peripheral pulmonary embolism (PE) by using dual-source CT pulmona- ry angiography (CTPA}. Methods CTPA was performed for patients with clinical suspect of PE. Fourteen eases were first diag- nosed as peripheral PE (with PE at segmental-or-below levels) and 15 cases were diagnosed as negative. Their CTA data were retro spectively analyzed. The raw CTA data were reformatted and interpreted by two cardiovascular radiologists independently with post- processing technique of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and maxium intensive projection (MIP}. According to the reference standard, the evaluation of the segmental and subsegmental pulmonary artery and peripheral PE was set as positive, negative, sus- pected and non-displayed. Diagnostic difference and goodness of fit between the two radiologists were assessed by using ma:tchedpairs Z2 test and kappa test. Results Among the 15 cases who were first diagnosed as negative of PE,2 were detected peripheral PE with consentaneous. All the segmental arteries of the 16 peripheral PE cases were showed clearly, The display rate of the subseg- mental arteries was 90.39 %. No significant difference were found in the detection of segmental and subsegmenta] PE between the two readers (X2 =0. 333, P=0. 954 and X2= 3. 325 ,P=0. 767). The goodness of fit was quite good in the evaluation of segmental and subsegmental PE (k=0.92 and k = 0.81}. Conclusion The segmental and subsegmental pulmonary artery can be clearly dis- played by dual-source CTPA. The consistency of the peripheral PE were confirmed quite good in different readers. Therefore, CT- PA can be used in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary embolism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.122