检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《临床肾脏病杂志》2012年第10期450-452,共3页Journal Of Clinical Nephrology
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:2011N5FL)
摘 要:目的 评价血清半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C(Cystatin C,CysC)相关方程在不同病因引起慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的肾小球滤过率(GFR)计算中的临床应用价值。方法选择CKD患者255例,运用MDRD方程(mGFR)、MDRD简化方程(rnGFR)、Hoek方程(hGFR)、2006年中华医学会肾脏病学分会推荐的方程(c-cGFR1,c-cGFR2)计算GFR,与^99m-二乙撑三胺五乙酸(^99m TcDT-PA)肾动态显像测得的。肾小球滤过率(sGFR)进行比较。结果在分期比较中,各方程估算的GFR和sGFR相关性一般,CysC相关方程能更敏感反应GFR;在不同病因分组中,各方程估算的GFR和sGFR均明显相关,特别是c-cGFR2。结论在CysC相关方程中,以2006中华公式2计算的c-cG-FR2与sGFR相关性及一致性最好,并且在糖尿病肾脏病组中,各方程相关系数优于其他组别,有必要进一步大规模临床研究证明其应用价值。Objective To evaluate the applied value of the serum Cystatin-C (Cys C) dependent equations for calculating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with chronic kidney diseases (CKD) caused by various pathogenic factors. Methods 255 patients with CKD were selected. The GFR was calculated by using MDRD equation, simplified MDRD equation, Hoek equation and the equa- tions (c cGFR1, c-cGFR2) recommended by Chinese Medical Association Section of Nephrology in 2006, and compared with sGFR measured by 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging. Results In the comparison grouped by stage, the GFR from each equation had general correlation with sGFR, while Cystatin-C dependent equations were more sensitive for GFR;in the comparison grouped by pathogenic factors,GFR from each equation was obviously correlated with sGFR, especially for c-cGFR2. Conclu- sions In all Cys C dependent equations,c-cGFR2 has the best correlation and consistency with sGFR. Each equation has better correlations coefficients in diabetic nephropathy group than in the others, which demands an advanced larger scale clinical research to prove their applied value.
关 键 词:半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C 肾小球肾炎 肾小球滤过率
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28