检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张世鹏[1]
出 处:《法学论坛》2012年第6期102-107,共6页Legal Forum
基 金:北京市科委科技计划课题<科技型中小企业融资法律问题研究>(Z10000800041009)的阶段性研究成果之一
摘 要:我国高利贷是指利率超过中国人民银行公布的金融机构同期、同档次贷款利率的4倍的民间借贷。这种由中国人民银行规定一个刚性的利率上限作为高利贷认定标准的方法缺陷颇多,既没有解决认定方法的分歧,也牺牲了司法的能动性。从比较法上考察,高利贷认定标准有管制模式和自由模式的立法区分,我国当前立法属于管制模式,但是从平衡反高利贷立法的价值诉求、顺应反高利贷立法的历史趋势和兼顾我国现实情况三个方面考虑,我国高利贷认定标准立法需要向自由模式转型。In China,usury is that unauthorized body lend money with the interest rate above four times of the rate for the same period and type loan which is issued by People' Bank of China.The method to identify a usury with a rigid interest rate-ceiling set by the People's Bank of China has a lot of defects,which is unable to harmonize the different opinions about the standard of usury and harmful to the judicial discretion.According to the judicial comparison,the legislation of the usury standard can be classified as control mode and free mode.Chinese legislation belongs to control mode and need a transformation to free mode.The transformation is necessary to balance of the values of anti-usury law,and conform to the trend of the anti-usury law and the Chinese reality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.252.248