水中分娩84例临床分析  

Clinical study of 84 cases of water birth

作　　者：李晓燕[1] 李凤梅[1] 王雅莉[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州市中心医院妇产科,450000

出　　处：《中国实用医刊》2012年第21期60-62,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨水中分娩与传统分娩方式在产程、疼痛程度、软组织损伤、新生儿出生情况等方面的差异。方法选择2010年7月至2011年9月在郑州市中心医院接受水中分娩的初产妇84例作为水中分娩组，同期自然分娩的初产妇92例作为对照组。两组产妇的年龄、孕周及新生儿体质量等方面比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结果水中分娩组在产程时间、疼痛程度、软组织损伤方面比对照组有优势，差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。水中分娩组在新生儿出生情况方面与对照组相比，差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论水中分娩在缩短产程、镇痛、减轻软组织损伤等方面具有较明显的优越性，是一种更加安全、舒适的自然分娩方式。Objective To investigate the differences between water delivery and the traditional mode of delivery in the birth process, the degree of pain, soft tissue injury, and the neonate birth status. Methods From April 2010 to September 2011, 84 pregnant women with water delivery were enrolled in the water birth group and another 92 pregnant women with natural birth were enrolled in the control group. There were no significant differences in the age, gestational weeks of pregnant women and the weight of neonate in the two groups （P 〉 0. 05）. Results Water birth group has superior advantage to the control group in the time of birth process, labor pain, laceration of birth canal, and there were significant differences （ P 〈 0. 05 ）. But there was no significant difference in the outcomes of the neonate between the two group （ P 〉 0. 05）. Conclusions Water birth has the superiority of shortening the stage of labor, relieving labor pain, reducing soft tissue injury, and is a safe and comfortable natural delivery mode.

关 键 词：水中分娩 产程 产痛 软组织损伤 新生儿评分 

分 类 号：R714[医药卫生—妇产科学]