检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:傅前明[1]
出 处:《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第5期50-55,共6页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
摘 要:选取欧盟实施2008第101号指令作为研究对象,采用原因分析、目的分析、合法性分析的方法,对欧盟充任"气候领袖"、引领国际气候谈判的战术、战略和效果进行了评估。结果表明,欧盟充分利用《联合国气候变化框架公约》和《京都议定书》所规定的体制和机制,以推进国际民航减排为突破口,成功地将国际碳减排压力引向中、美等国,且极大地削弱了"共同但有区别责任"原则的国际法律力量,从而为其布局2012年后国际气候立法安排赢得了主动权。而中国民航产业发展以及中国谈判基本立场均受到了强烈的冲击,中国亟需从维护国家战略利益的高度进行科学应对。The paper selected DIRECTIVE 2008/101/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUN- CIL as the study object, adopted the cause analysis method, the objective analysis method, and the validity analysis method, and evaluated the European Union's tactics, strategies and the effects. The research results indicated that the EU had made full use of the mechanisms and systems in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol, promoted international aviation emissions reduction, weakened the law efficacy of the "common but differentiated responsibilities" principle, transferred the international reduction pressure into the countries such as China and the United States. Also the EU had won the initiative of the international climate legisla- tion arrangement. And China's civil aviation industry and the basic negotiation positions were strongly impacted. So China needs to safeguard its national strategic interests from the highly scientific point.
分 类 号:D996.9[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.205