两种不同自我关注模式对社交焦虑个体情绪和负性自我评价的影响  

Effects of Two Distinct Modes of Self-focused Attention on Emotion and Global Negative Self-judgment in Social Anxiety

作　　者：王华[1] 孙维燕[1] 陶嵘[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学心理学院,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2012年第5期623-626,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(09YJCXLX009);人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室开放课题(201101)

摘　　要：目的:探讨体验式和分析式自我关注模式对高、低社交焦虑个体情绪、负性自我评价的影响,为社交焦虑个体的临床干预提供新的思路。方法:通过创设实验室预期焦虑情景,引发高、低社交焦虑个体的焦虑情绪,并进一步通过不同指导语引导焦虑个体形成体验式或分析式自我关注模式,分析社交焦虑个体在两种自我关注模式下,情绪和负性自我评价的差异。结果:①两种不同的自我关注模式下,高、低社交焦虑个体焦虑情绪没有显著差异;②不同的自我关注模式对负性自我评价的影响仅限于高社交焦虑组。结论:对社交焦虑个体而言,不同的自我关注模式具有不同的功能属性,体验式自我关注是适应性的,而分析式自我关注是非适应性的。Objective： To explore the effects of two distinct modes of self-focused attention on emotion and global negative self-judgment in social anxiety.Methods： The study arranges social contexts to trigger anxiety,and divide subjects into analytical self-focus or experiential self-focus condition respectively through instruction,investigate the emotion and global negative self-judgment.Results： The research ①found that analytical and experiential self-focus did not differ in their effects on anxious mood;②analytical and experiential self-focus had significant difference on the emotion and global negative self-judgment only in high socially anxiety.Conclusion： The functions of the two modes are different,and the experiential self-focus is adaptive,the analytical self-focus is non-adaptive.

关 键 词：社交焦虑 自我关注 分析式自我关注 体验式自我关注 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]