检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学珠江医院儿科中心,广东广州510282
出 处:《护理学杂志》2012年第21期49-50,共2页
摘 要:目的探讨气管切开早期患儿应用气胀式气囊加压氧气雾化吸入的效果。方法将100例气管切开早期患儿随机分成观察组和对照组各50例,对照组采用常规氧气雾化吸入,观察组采用气胀式气囊加压氧气雾化吸入,对两组患儿雾化治疗效果进行比较。结果观察组患儿疼痛程度及肺炎发生率显著低于对照组,湿化效果及血氧饱和度显著优于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论气管切开早期患儿应用气胀式气囊加压氧气雾化吸入可起到更好的雾化治疗效果。Objective To explore effects of inflatable airbag applied to pressurized oxygen-driven nebulization in tracheotomized chil- dren. Methods One hundred tracheotomized children were randomly and equally divided into an observation group and a control group receiving either adjustable pressure pneumatic airbags for pressurized oxygen-driven nebulization or conventional oxygen- driven nebulization. Results Compared with the control group, severity of pain and incidence of pneumonia in the observation group were significantly milder and lower, and humidification effect and pulse oxygen saturation were significantly better and higher in the observation group (P〈0.05 ,P〈0.01). Conclusion Application of inflatable airbag to pressurized oxygen-driven nebulization in tra- cheotomized children, can obtain better therapeutic effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15