检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]昆明理工大学环境科学与工程学院,云南昆明650500 [2]昆明理工大学法学院,云南昆明650500 [3]北京市朝阳区人民检察院,北京100025
出 处:《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第5期41-46,共6页Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"刑罚的伦理性分析"(08XFX016)阶段性成果
摘 要:近年来,"大调解"作为一种新的纠纷解决机制日渐兴起。转型时期社会矛盾纠纷的特征以及现行人民调解制度的有效性危机是"大调解"机制建设的基本背景。同传统的纠纷解决机制相比,"大调解"机制在当前转型时期优势明显,但是也存在一系列不容忽视的内在紧张,如合理性与合法性的紧张,运作的行政化,性质与功能的定位有待进一步澄清等等。长远来看,培育社会本身的矛盾化解能力,提升社会自治程度依然是"大调解"机制建设的努力方向。The multipartite mediation mechanism discussed here has grown rapidly in recent years. The so- cial conflicts in transitional society and the crisis of the people's mediation system are the background of the rise of the muhipartite mediation mechanism. Although the multipartite mediation mechanism itself has the unique superiority, which can meet the realistic need to resolve dispute effectively. Compared with the traditional dispute resolution mechanism, it also has some nonnegligible internal tensions, such as rationality versus legitimacy, administralization of its operation,the vagueness of its function. Hence, cultivation of the society's ability to resolve the dispute, and promote the extent of social autonomy, is still the basic direction of constructing the multipartite mediation mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117