湿润烧伤膏与凡士林治疗纹身削切术后创面的对比观察  

Comparison on the Clinical Therapeutic Effects of MEBO Wound Ointment and Vaseline in the Treatment of Wounds after Tattoos Excision

作　　者：刘涛[1] 刘飞[1] 张培超[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东省德州市人民医院,山东德州253000

出　　处：《中国烧伤创疡杂志》2012年第5期405-407,共3页The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers

摘　　要：目的对比观察湿润烧伤膏(MEBO)与凡士林治疗纹身削切术后创面的临床疗效。方法纹身皮肤削切术后创面分别采用湿润烧伤膏纱条和凡士林纱条换药治疗,分为湿润烧伤膏组和凡士林组,分别观察愈合时间、局部明显疼痛例数、创面感染率及瘢痕增生率。结果皮肤纹身削切术后,创面分别用湿润烧伤膏纱条和凡士林纱条换药治疗,创面均愈合,但湿润烧伤膏组(14.5d±3.6d)较凡士林组(21.5d±4.5d)愈合时间显著缩短(P<0.01),明显疼痛患者例数显著降低(6.5%与65.7%)(P<0.01),创面感染率明显降低(2.4%与25.6%)(P<0.01),瘢痕增生率明显降低(5.4%与16.2%)(P<0.01)。结论应用湿润烧伤膏纱条治疗纹身削切术后创面能够明显缩短愈合时间,减少患者疼痛,降低创面感染率及瘢痕增生率,临床疗效显著。Objective To observe comparatively the clinical therapeutic effects of MEBO Wound Ointment and Vaseline in the wound treatment after Tattoos excision. Methods Perform the dressing-change with MEBO Gauze and Vas- eline Gauze on the wounds after tattoos excision in MEBO Group and Vaseline Group respectively and then the wound heal- ing time, local pain scale, the rate of wound infection and the rate of scar hyperplasia were observed. Results All wounds were healed, but MEBO group had apparently shorter period of healing time （ 14. 5 ±＋3.6 d） than that （21.5 d ±4. 5 d） of Vaseline group （P 〈 0. 01 ） . The rate of apparent pain complaints was significantly decreased in MEBO Group compared with Vaseline Group （6. 5% vs. 65.7% , P 〈 0. 01 ）. So did the rate of wound infection （2.4% vs. 25.6%, P 〈 0. 01 ） and the rate of sear hyperplasia （5.4% vs. 16. 2% , P 〈 0. 01 ）. Conclusion With the application of MEBO Gauze in the wound treatment after tattoos excision, the healing time can be apparently shortened with lower pain complaints rate, wound infection rate and scar hyperplasia rate, clinical therapeutic efficacy being significant.

关 键 词：纹身 手术创面 湿润烧伤膏 凡士林 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R625[医药卫生—整形外科]