Finding Consistency in Rousseau  

作　　者：Dimitria Electra Gatzia 

机构地区：[1]The University of Akron Wayne College

出　　处：《Journal of Philosophy Study》2012年第9期650-663,共14页哲学研究（英文版）

摘　　要：Several of Rousseau＇s critics begin with the presupposition that his writings are inconsistent or incoherent ann proceed to locate the ＂essence＂ of his philosophy in some of his writings while excluding others. Ernst Cassirer is among the few philosophers who have attempted to defend Rousseau＇s claim to consistency. Despite its broad influence, Cassirer＇s interpretation has remained largely unchallenged. The aim of this paper is twofold. Firstly, it aims to show that Cassirer＇s interpretation undermines （1） the important role Rousseau assigns to pity in both the state of nature and civil society and （2） the significant role the general will plays in his political theory. Secondly, it proposes an alternative interpretation that succeeds in uniting Rousseau＇s opus.

关 键 词：CASSIRER Kant PITY general will ANARCHISM 

分 类 号：TP183[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程] K825.1[自动化与计算机技术—控制科学与工程]