检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东大学威海分校法学院,山东威海264209
出 处:《石家庄经济学院学报》2012年第5期128-133,共6页Journal of Shijiazhuang University of Economics
摘 要:刑罚目的在刑罚理论中居于核心地位,它对于刑罚的创制与适用有着直接的指导意义。从心理学角度探究刑罚目的,将有利于完善国家立法和司法。法律情境中存在3种心理状态:公正、上位公正和下位公正;基于个人的刑罚目的是实现以公正为标准的个体心理均衡;基于社会的刑罚目的是实现以不平等的公正为标准的社会心理均衡;司法理念和刑罚制度要随着公正状态的变迁而变迁;社会心理获得有效均衡的途径是开启大众理性,降低社会交流的交易成本。The aim of penalty occupies the core position in the penalty theory, and it has directive meaning for the punishment creating and applying. Studying the aim of penalty in psychological terms will be helpful to the perfection of national legislation and judiciary. There are three types of psychological state in legal circumstances: justice, upper justice and lower justice. The aim of individual-based penalty is to realize individual psychological equilibrium with justice as a standard; the aim of societybased penalty is to realize social psychological equilibrium taking justice as a standard. The judicial philosophy and penalty system should vary with the state of justice. The effective way to obtain social psychological equilibrium is to open the public sense, reduce the transaction cost of social exchange.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222