检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韦文朗[1] 张晶晶[1] 邸星星[1] 杨敬娟[1] 林辉[1] 韦炫羽[1]
机构地区:[1]广西中医药大学第一附属医院美肤激光整形美容科,广西南宁530023
出 处:《中国美容医学》2012年第11期1925-1927,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察两种磨削方法在表皮移植术治疗白癜风中的应用效果。方法:32例局限型稳定期白癜风患者随机分为高频电磨削组(A组)18例及机械磨削组(B组)14例,观察表皮移植后的疗效及手术的便利性。结果:A、B组的治愈率分别为65%和62.5%,有效率分别为91.67%和89.58%。结论:两组在疗效上无显著差异,高频电磨削法在不平坦的皮面更便于精细操作。Objective To evaluate two grinding methods used in vitiligo treatment by epidermic grafting. Methods 32 local and stable vitiligo patients were involved and divided into 2 groups randomly: high frequency group (A) and mechanical grinding group (B), The effect and convenience were compared. Results The cure rate of A group and B group was 65% and 62.5% respectively, the effective rate of them was 91.67% and 89.58% respectively. Conclusions There was no significant differences between two groups yet high frequency was more convenience in some circumstance.
分 类 号:R758.41[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117