检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学土木建筑工程学院,武汉430072 [2]湖南工学院建筑工程系,衡阳421002
出 处:《工程力学》2012年第11期272-276,301,共6页Engineering Mechanics
摘 要:通过理论分析证明曲率模态差指标存在两个不足:一是对曲率模态节点处损伤不够敏感,二是不能有效反映损伤程度。对曲率模态差指标进行改进,提出叠加曲率模态改变率指标,理论上克服了原指标的不足。采用连续梁算例进行对比验证,结果表明新指标能够同时反映损伤位置和损伤程度,较曲率模态差指标更加优越。最后提出了基于新指标的单元损伤因子估算方法并验证了有效性。Two deficiencies of the curvature modal difference (CMD) index are firstly proved through theoretical analysis. One is that the CMD index is insensitive to damages occurring at curvature modal nodes and another is that the CMD could not reflect damage degree effectively. Then a new improved index called superimposed curvature modal change rate (SCMCR) is proposed in this paper, which can overcome the deficiencies of the CMD index theoretically. A continuous beam is selected as a numerical example and the results show that the SCMCR index could reflect both the location and degree of damage; it is superior to the CMD index. Finally, a method for estimating damage factors based on the new index is proposed and validated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43