检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:庄丽丽[1] 马迎华[1] 赵海[1] 田野[1] 宋娟[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学儿童青少年卫生研究所,北京100191
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2012年第10期1192-1194,共3页Chinese Journal of School Health
摘 要:目的对初步编制的"中学生生活技能评价量表"进行信度和效度检验,为国内生活技能教育提供有效的测评工具。方法在北京、内蒙古、新疆、陕西、上海5个省(市),采用方便整群抽样方法抽取20所初中学校与20所高中学校共4 990名学生进行"中学生生活技能评价量表"的问卷调查。结果全量表Cronbach'sα内部一致性信度系数为0.946,分量表的信度系数分别为0.626~0.844;分半信度的Spearman相关系数为0.814(P<0.01);各因子与总量表得分之间的相关系数为0.619~0.865(P值均<0.01);采用主成分分析法,验证性的提取8个公因子,累计可以解释总体变异的54.47%;量表的区分效度较好(P<0.01)。结论初步编制的"中学生生活技能评价量表"具有良好的信度和效度。个别题目经修订和再次验证后,可以作为国内生活技能教育的测评工具。Objective To test the reliability and validity of Secondary School Students' Life Skills Scale which was drew up,in order to promote an effective evaluation tool for life skills in China.Methods A total of 4 990 students from 20 junior schools and 20 high schools in Beijing city,Shanghai city,Inner Mongolia,Xinjiang and Shaanxi province were sampled with convenient cluster sampling to test the reliability and validity of the scale.Results Cronbach's α of the total scale was 0.946,of the 8 subscales was 0.626-0.844,Split-half coefficient was 0.814,which showed the reliability of the scales was accurate;The correlated coefficients between total scale and 8 subscales were 0.619-0.865(P0.01),the 8 factors could explain 54.47 % of total scale variances,which showed good content validity;the scale also had good discrimination structure.Conclusion Secondary School Students' Life Skills Scale has good reliability and validity,as a primary scale,several titles needs to be revised and further improvements,then it can be used as an evaluation tool for life skills in China.
分 类 号:R395.6[哲学宗教—心理学] B841.7[医药卫生—医学心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3