检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建省龙岩市第二医院骨科,福建龙岩364000
出 处:《中国当代医药》2012年第29期26-27,共2页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨3种治疗方法治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的疗效及术后并发症。方法将本院收治的85例肱骨髁上骨折的患儿分为A、B、C组,分别采用闭合复位石膏固定、闭合复位经皮交叉克氏针固定、切开复位交叉克氏针固定。治疗完成后比较3组患儿治疗的优良率,以及肘内翻、神经损伤的发生率。结果 A、B、C组优良率为78.9%、81.8%、80.0%,3组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A、B、C组肘内翻的发生率分别为18.4%、9.0%、12.0%,B组与C组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组显著高于B组及C组(P<0.05),A、B、C组神经损伤的发生率分别为2.6%、4.5%、8.0%,3组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 3种治疗方法疗效均较好,应根据不同的骨折类型选择合适的治疗方法。Objective To investigate clinical efficacy and complications of three methods of humeral supracondylar fractures in children.Methods Eighty-five children of supracondylar fractures were divided into group A,group B,and group C,who were respectively given closedreduction,closed reduction,cross percutaneous pinning and open reduction internal fixation.Excellent-good rate,the incidences of cubitus varus and nerve injury were compared after treatment among the three groups.Results Excellent-good rates of group A,group B,group C were 78.9%,81.8%,80.0%,and there were no significant difference(P 0.05).Cubitus varus rates of group A,group B,group C were 18.4% 9.0%,12.0%,there were no significant difference between group B and group C(P 0.05),while group A was significantly higher than group B and C group(P 0.05).The incidence nerve injury of group A,group B,group C were 2.6%,4.5%,8.0%,which were significantly different(P 0.05).Conclusion Clinical efficacies of three methods are all good,and we should choose appropriate treatment according to different types of fractures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229