可预见规则的现代难题  

Modern Problems of the Foreseeability Rule

作　　者：孙良国[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《西南大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第6期30-35,173,共6页Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"合同法中预期与依赖保护研究"(10CFX044);项目负责人:孙良国;吉林大学基本科研业务费项目"新时代背景下格式合同规制的逻辑与制度"(2011QY027);项目负责人:孙良国

摘　　要：可预见规则虽然经过了近200年的发展,但目前仍然面对诸多难题。"预见"一词具有三个渐进层次的含义,法院在采纳哪个含义上做法不同。即使损失可预见,如果当事人没有默示承担此损失的风险,也很难适用该规则。可预见规则需要考虑不同的合同类型差别对待而非统一处理。贸易惯例应优先于可预见规则适用,否则不能应对现代企业生产方式的挑战。目前的可预见规则提出了两种不确定性,我们应采用默示协议标准来降低其不确定性。The foreseeability rule has several problems though it has developed for about two hundred years.The court has different choices in adopting which of the three progressive meanings.Diverse kinds of contract should be treated differently rather than equally within the rule.Trade custom should take precedence of the foreseeability rule in the application of the rule,or else it can't meet the challenge of modern mode of enterprise production.Two kinds of certainty are created by the rule which should be lessened by adopting the standard of implicit agreement.

关 键 词：可预见规则 风险承担 合同类型 贸易惯例 不确定性 默示协议 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]