检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学工商管理学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《科学学研究》2012年第11期1735-1740,共6页Studies in Science of Science
基 金:浙江省自然科学基金(Y7100740)
摘 要:通过综合考察知识产权政策内容建立知识产权政策量化标准,从政策力度、政策目标、政策措施三个方面对知识产权政策进行量化并建立经典的计量模型对中国知识产权政策的影响进行评估。结果发现,政策力度能显著促进新产品销售率,但会限制专利授权量;权利界定目标显著促进了技术创新绩效,但侵权惩戒目标却显著限制了技术创新绩效;最主要的行政措施对技术创新绩效的影响很小,而真正起作用的财税措施没有得到足够的重视。To establish the quantitative criteria of intellectual property policy through comprehensive survey of intellectual property poli- cy content, and to quantify intellectual property policies from three aspects of policy efforts, policy objectives and policy measures, then establish econometric models to analyze the influences of intellectual property policies on technological innovation performance. This paper introduces quantitative research method to research field of policies. The results show that policy efforts promote the rate of new product sales significantly, but limit patents granted; right definition promotes technological innovation performance significantly, but infringement punishment limits technological innovation performance markedly; the leading policy measure is administrative measure, and its impact is very small, while the finance and taxation measure that can really impact innovation performance directly do not get e- nough attention
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.187.74