语用学理论构筑中的理性思想及其反拨效应  

Rationality and its corrective power in the construction and evaluation of pragmatic theories

作　　者：姚晓东[1] 秦亚勋[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学 [2]福建师范大学

出　　处：《现代外语》2012年第4期338-345,436,共8页Modern Foreign Languages

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(RW2011-25);北京林业大学青年科技启动基金(2010BLX21)资助

摘　　要：理性主体假设是语用学的默认前提,在其理论构筑中从未缺席,也有着不同体现。梳理和挖掘二者关系对认识和评价语用学理论具有积极的反拨效应,为重新审视语用原则、深化对交际主体的认识提供新的参照视角。对比分析经典语用学与新/后格莱斯语用学中的理性概念后显示:研究者的视角差异会导致其关注焦点的相应变化;理性假设在"出身背景"不同的语用学理论派别中的内涵与约束力不同,因而学界对各派理论成败得失的评价也应有所区别。'Rational agent presumption' is the default assumption strongly asserting its diverse roles in the theoretical construction of pragmatics.A close examination of the relationship between the discipline and the presumption proves a positive corrective to the understanding and evaluation of the pragmatic theories,and provides a fresh point of reference to revisit pragmatic principles and deepen our understanding of the communicative subjects.In comparing the role rationality plays in classical Gricean and neo-/post-Gricean pragmatics,the study finds that differences in the researchers' perspective lead to changes in their orientations,and that academic evaluation of pragmatic theories should take into consideration the fact that with different schools of pragmatics,rationality differs in its connotation and binding force.

关 键 词：理性主体假设 工具理性 论证理性 反拨效应 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]