中国制造业的产业质量阶梯研究  

The Quality Ladders of Trading Products in the Chinese Manufacturing Sector

作　　者：刘伟丽[1] 陈勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]深圳大学经济学院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《中国工业经济》2012年第11期58-70,共13页China Industrial Economics

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"中国离岸外包区位选择的决定因素及其优势定位的博弈研究"(批准号09YJA790142)

摘　　要：本文研究了中国制造业的产品质量阶梯和产业质量阶梯,在Khandelwal的国际贸易产品质量模型的基础上,研究适合于发展中国家的产品质量理论模型,运用2000—2008年中国海关产品协调商品名称和编码制度八位码的海关进出口企业和产品月度数据进行实证分析,采用产品单位价值、市场份额和人均GDP等指标来衡量最终产品和中间产品质量,将产业质量阶梯与全要素生产率进行相关性研究,并与美国的产业质量阶梯进行比较研究,提出针对中国制造业产业质量发展的政策建议,短期为赢得更多的市场份额,中国应该发展质量阶梯较短的产业;长期为促进产业升级和经济发展,应该积极进行产品的质量升级和技术进步,发展质量阶梯较长的产业。本文的另一个结论是,根据广义经济分类研究发现,中国进口最终产品质量高于中间产品质量,发展加工贸易可以促进出口和产品质量升级。This paper expands quality model constructed by Khandelwal, based on the customs import monthly data of Chinese manufacturing sector or products, and estimated products qualities, quality ladders and manufacturing industry quality ladders of imported from different countries. This paper estimates qualities of final goods and intermediate goods by unit value, share of market and GDP, based on 9-year HS8 customs import monthly data. The paper compares with the industrial quality ladders of Chinese firms and American firms. We analyze the relationship of quality ladders and TFP. Finally, this paper suggests China would develop industries producing goods with short quality ladders in order to take bigger share of markets in the short-run, and develop industries producing goods with long quality ladders by promoting industrial upgrading and technological progress in the long-run. The other conclusion is that final goods imported to China have higher quality than intermediate goods.

关 键 词：产品质量 质量阶梯 全要素生产率 中间产品贸易 

分 类 号：F426.4[经济管理—产业经济]