政府和企业交换中的一致与分歧  

The Consistence and the Difference on the Exchange between the Governemnt and the Firm

作　　者：金太军[1] 袁建军[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学政治与公共管理学院,江苏苏州215123

出　　处：《学术月刊》2012年第11期88-98,共11页Academic Monthly

基　　金：江苏省高校社科基金项目"政府和企业协调应对突发公共事件机制研究"(2010SJB630033);江苏省社科基金项目"江苏应对重大突发公共事件研究"(11zzc008)的中期研究成果之一

摘　　要：政企研究不仅需要关注其宏观角色与功能,还需要剖析其功能实现中的微观互动。以社会交换理论为基础的复杂交换框架为诠释政府和企业互动提供了一个新视角。在理论层面,政府和企业基于价值设定、资源占有和影响力方面的一致与分歧促成了其间的交换关系。其中,价值内在地限定了政府和企业的行为域,预设了两者交互作用的集合;资源结构与水平为其价值的实现提供了潜在可能;影响力则是这种潜在可能向现实迈进的中介力量,它通过比对行动者力量来揭示原本毫无现实关联的行动者交往的未来,从而降低不确定性带来的风险;交换行为则是政府和企业理性互动的结果表现之一,它是一个具有一定时间跨度的持续性互惠行为。在现实的交换行为中,由于主体的分化,交换资源从外延式向内涵式转变,交换方式从无媒介型向有媒介型转变,交换关系日趋复杂化。政府和企业交换所展现出的不确定性及其不良后果,很大程度上源自交换中一致与分歧的失衡。We should not only pay attention to the macro-structure and macro-role of the relationship between the government and the firm, but also to its micro-interaction. The complicated exchange frame, which is based on the social exchange theory, supply a new angle for explaining the interactive between the government and the firm. It is the consistence and difference on value setting, resource occupation and the influence between the government and the firm that produce the exchange relationship. In reality, because of the polarizing of subject, the exchange resource changed from the extention model to intention model, and the exchange mode changed form the no-medium model to medium model. But we can see that, to a large extent, the uncertainty and adverse consequences in the exchange between the government and firm due to the imbalance of the consistence and the difference.

关 键 词：政府与企业 价值 资源 影响力 交换 

分 类 号：F123.15[经济管理—世界经济]