对我国犯罪既遂标准理论的检讨  

A Review of the Theory of Accomplished Offense Criterion

作　　者：陆诗忠[1] 

机构地区：[1]烟台大学法学院,山东烟台264005

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2012年第6期64-72,共9页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：作为传统犯罪既遂标准的"构成要件齐备说"存在着重大缺陷。王志祥教授、徐光华博士为"构成要件齐备说"所进行的辩护难以奏效。新近出现的"类型化标准说"提倡不同的犯罪类型适用不同的既遂标准,其旨在增强犯罪既遂标准理论的实践功效。可是,该学说不仅未跳出"构成要件齐备说"的藩篱,而且又制造了一些"麻烦"。"犯罪客体侵害说"作为犯罪既遂的判断标准是可行的。这是因为它能充分体现立法者的意志,符合犯罪客体在犯罪构成体系中的合理定位,具有较强的可操作性。"犯罪客体侵害说"还应进一步优化为"犯罪对象侵害说"。The traditional theory of the presence of all constitutive elements of crime has some major defects.The newly theory of typical standard which advocates different crime type apply to accomplished offense criterion aims at enhancing its practical value.However,the theory is also problematic.The theory of infringement of criminal object is feasible,which may reflect the legislative purpose,according to the rational location in crime constitution system,has better operational effect.The theory of infringement of criminal object should optimize for the theory of Infringement of target of crime.

关 键 词：犯罪既遂 犯罪既遂标准 构成要件齐备说 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]