检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学民商法学院 [2]重庆市沙坪坝区人民法院
出 处:《知识产权》2012年第11期44-48,共5页Intellectual Property
摘 要:专利权被宣告无效,对业已发生的技术交易行为产生了根本性的影响。无论是已经履行还是尚在履行的交易合同,都面临权利依据丧失合法性的难题。对这一法律困局的处置,《专利法》第47条原则性地放弃了"公正/不公正"的立场,转而采取"治/乱"的政策选择。事实上,这一政策标准的选择具有相当的世界性意义。为消弭由此可能引发的社会不满,《专利法》第47条修复性地将"公正标准"作为例外规则,预设了宽松的法官自由裁量权。The invalidation of a patent right has critical impact on the trading of technology that was executed. The loss of legitimacy, on which the patent right is based is a problem for the transaction contact, either fulfilled or being performed. In dealing with the legal dilemma, under Art.47 of Patent Law, the standard of justice and unfairness is principally given up, and a position of political choice between the order and the disorder is established. In fact, this political standard is of great worldwide significance. In order to eliminate social dissatisfactions arising from the establishment of the this political position, Art.47 alternatively sets "Fairness Standard" as an exception rule, which has left much space for the judges to excise their discretions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30