社团罚的受案标准研究  

Research on Cognizable Standards of Corporal Punishment

作　　者：赵延聪[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学,山东济南250100

出　　处：《行政与法》2012年第11期91-94,共4页Administration and Law

摘　　要：近些年来,对社团罚求告无门的事例时见报端,学者们大多主张依据法律法规授权的规定,将这类纠纷纳入行政诉讼受案范围。但实践表明,传统授权理论在社团罚的受案标准问题上存在诸多局限,而完全摒弃这一理论又不现实。故有必要结合司法实践的需要,在协调权利保障与社团自治之间矛盾的基础上,对授权理论作必要的补充和完善,为法院审查社团罚提供可行的标准。In recent years,there are many reports about dismissal of litigation about corporal punishment.Most scholars hold that it should be accepted by the court as a kind of administrative behavior authorized by laws and regulations.However,it has been proved by practice that although traditional theory about authorized administration has many limitations in setting cognizable standards for corporal punishment,completely abandoning the theory is not realistic.Therefore,in order to set feasible standards for the court to decide whether to accept disputes about corporal punishment,it is necessary to make some improvements about the authorization theory,on the basis of coordinating the contradiction between rights protection and corporal autonomy.

关 键 词：社团罚 受案标准 授权理论 授权规范体系 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]