检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘云
机构地区:[1]济南行政学院,山东济南250014
出 处:《行政与法》2012年第11期100-104,共5页Administration and Law
摘 要:自由裁量权一直是法学界的热点问题之一,广泛存在于司法领域和行政领域。随着我国司法体制改革的不断深入,法官自由裁量权逐渐成为人们争论的焦点问题。法官的刑事自由裁量权是刑事审判权的重要组成部分,有其存在的必然性和价值,但在司法实践中确实存在部分法官滥用刑事自由裁量权的情况,如何在中国司法改革进程中构建适合自己法治状况水平的法官刑事自由裁量权是学术界和司法界一个不容忽视的课题。基于中国法治建设的现实考量,从实体、程序、制度、社会层面建立起一种可控性的刑事自由裁量权,可以有效防止司法的堕落,维护司法公正和法律权威。Discretion has always been one of the hot issues of the legal community in the field of justice and administrative areas.With the deepening of the reform of the judicial system,the criminal discretion of judges gradually becomes the focus of people debating.Though the judges' criminal discretion is an important part of the criminal jurisdiction,there are some judges who abused of the criminal discretion in judicial practice.So how to build criminal discretion of the judges for rule of law in the process of our judicial system reform is a topic that shouldn't be ignored in academic and judicial circles.Based on the reality of the construction of rule of law in china,it can effectively prevent judicial corruption,safeguard judicial justice and legal authority to establish the controllable criminal discretion in the substance,procedure,system and society.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15