关于行政复议委员会的冷思考  

Reflections on the Committee of Administrative Reconsideration

作　　者：黄学贤[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学法学院

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2012年第11期104-110,共7页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：江苏省高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地苏州大学公法研究中心重大招标项目"行政程序与行政诉讼法律制度研究"(2010JDxM040)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：目前行政复议委员会试点的模式主要有三种,一是将原来分散于政府各部门的行政复议权,全部集中到政府设立的行政复议委员会统一行使;二是行政复议委员会集中行使部分政府部门的部分行政复议审理权;三是保持现行行政复议体制不变,通过吸收外部人士组成行政复议委员会,对重大疑难案件进行集体研究,以表决的方式形成案件处理建议意见,供行政复议机关在裁决时参考。在《行政复议法》修改之前,以听证为核心强化行政复议程序,也即以第三种模式为抓手推进行政复议改革,不失为可行的方案。在取得更多经验后,再引进一个真正成熟的行政复议委员会制度,从而推动整个行政复议制度走向完善。Currently,there are mainly three experimental models of administrative reconsideration committee： the first is to establish a new committee which exercising all the concentrated powers originally apportioned to each governmental organs;the second is also to establish a new committee which exercising part of the concentrated powers originally apportioned to some governmental organs,and the third is to maintain current system and set up a administrative reconsideration committee absorbing outside personnels and collectively study some major and complex cases thus to work out a conclusion for administrative reconsideration body to decide such cases.Before amending the Law of Administrative Reconsideration,strengthening the procedure of administrative reconsideration centering on hearing,namely,based on the third model to facilitate the reform of administrative reconsideration is a kind of feasible choice,after accumulating some experiences,then to introduce a real mature system of administrative reconsideration committee and to perfect the whole administrative reconsideration system.

关 键 词：行政复议委员会 问题 程序 发展 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]