检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓媛妤[1]
机构地区:[1]广州开发区医院,510730
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2012年第21期3182-3183,共2页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的观察分析微波热凝与雾化吸入这两种方法治疗慢性增生性咽炎的临床效果及安全性。方法将我院40例患者随机分为对照组和实验组两组。两组均采取常规消炎药物进行对症治疗,实验组在常规治疗的基础上采取微波热凝疗法进行治疗,对照组在常规治疗的基础上采取雾化吸入疗法进行治疗,对比两种疗法的临床疗效。结果实验组总有效率为95.oo%,显著高于对照组的有效率65.00%(P〈0.05),而且实验组患者所产生的并发症明显少于对照组。结论微波热凝冶疗慢性增生性咽炎较雾化吸人治疗效果好,值得推广使用。Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of microwave thermal coagulation and inhalation in the treatment of chronic hyperplastic pharyngitis. Methods 40 patients were randomly divided into control group and study group. Both groups received conventional antibiotics for symptomatic treatment; and the study group received additional microwave thermal coagulation therapy while the control group re- ceived additional inhalation therapy. The clinical efficacy of the two therapies was analyzed and compared. Results The total effectiveness rate was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group ( 95.00% vs. 65.00%, P〈 0.05 ). The rate of complications was markedly lower in the study group than in the the control group. Conclusions Microwave thermal coagulation, as compared with inhalation, is more efficacious in the treatment of chronic hyperplastic pharyngitis.
分 类 号:R276.1[医药卫生—中医五官科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7