检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]深圳市人民医院暨南大学第二临床医学院产科,518020
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2012年第21期3188-3190,共3页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的探讨产后恢复仪结合常规护理措施对母婴分离产妇乳房护理的效果。方法将260例产妇随机分为干预组(130例)和对照组(130例),对照组给予常规乳房护理,干预组除给予常规乳房护理外,还应用产后恢复仪进行乳房护理,比较两组开始泌乳时间、泌乳量、乳房硬度。结果98.5%的干预组产妇的产后开始泌乳时间在72h内,高于对照组(79.3%)。干预组在出院时泌乳量高于对照组,且从产后第3天开始乳房硬度低于对照组,差别均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论产后恢复仪结合常规护理措施对产后母婴分离、产妇乳房护理的方法简便、舒适、有效、实用。Objective To explore the effect of recovery instrument combined with conventional nursing on breast of postpartum morthers separated from their newborns. Methods 260 mothers were randomly divided into study group ( 130 mothers ) and control group ( 130 mothers ). The control group received routine breast care, while the study group received postpartum recovery instrument for breast care in addition to conventional breast care. Time to initial lactation, amount of lactation, and degree of breast hardness were compared between the two groups. Results Time to initial lactation within 72 hours after delivery of was earlier in the study group ( 98.5% ) than in the control group ( 79.3% ~ and the amount of lactation was greater too and the degree of breast hardness was lower in the study group than t in the control group from the third day; there were significant statistical differences ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions Recover instrument combined with conventional care is convenient, comfortable, efficacious and practical. for postpartum morthers separated from their newborns.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3