叙事的误区——对鲁迅文学奖小说《茨菰》的叙事学分析  

Mistakes of Narration-An Narrative Analysis of Lu Xun Literary Prize Novel Arrowhead

作　　者：于启宏[1] 

机构地区：[1]长沙理工大学文法学院,湖南长沙410004

出　　处：《长沙理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第6期65-70,共6页Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology：Social Science

摘　　要：《茨菰》的结构性问题是叙事视角混乱,其受限视角与全知视角发生了大范围的冲突。关键问题在于:这种逻辑矛盾并没有换来相应的审美性补偿,且无助于主题的深化,所以《茨菰》的视角混乱与意识流的视角变换有天壤之别。《茨菰》的场景与概要之间缺乏紧密的逻辑关联,这在叙事学上意味着两败俱伤。对比三个数据,《茨菰》是《陈四》的近5倍,是《祝福》的2.4倍,这意味着《茨菰》的叙述人"我"不受节制,纵情张扬,"我"这个人物在高抬自己的同时也贬抑了悲剧主角。诸种负性因素把《茨菰》的悲剧旨意抵消殆尽,《茨菰》把一个少女自杀的悲剧事件叙述成了一个闹剧。语言欠简洁是《茨菰》的次生问题,其词汇密度偏低是旁证。The structural defects in Arrowhead by Su Tong are found in its confusion of narrative point of view as shown in the conflict between limited point of view and omniscient point of view in a large scope. The key problem lies in that such logical conflict has neither been replaced with necessary aesthetic compensation, nor become conducive to the deepening of the theme, which causes an immeasurable difference between the confusion of point of view and the transformation of perspectives in the stream of consciousness. The lack of close logical relevance between the setting and the outline leads to a loss on both sides in terms of narratology. With the comparison of 3 data, Arrowhead is approximately 5 times of Chen SI, and 2.4 times of Blessing, which means that the narrator ＂I＂ in Arrowhead is unrestrained with wild display of emotions, and that the character ＂I＂ belittles the tragic hero at the same time as it seeks to lift up its self. Various negative factors have completely canceled out the tragic purpose of Arrowhead , as it renders the tragic event of the suicide of a young glrl into a farce in its narration. In addition, lack of conciseness in language expressions is another problem with its low density of vocabulary as the side witness.

关 键 词：《茨菰》 叙事 视角 引语 

分 类 号：J207.425[艺术—美术]