对“效用侵害说”之刑法诠释学根基的反思  

On Criminal Law Hermeneutics Foundation of the "Utility Infringement Doctrine"

作　　者：王振[1] 武立松 

机构地区：[1]江西科技师范大学法学院,江西南昌330013

出　　处：《萍乡高等专科学校学报》2012年第5期28-32,共5页Journal of Pingxiang College

摘　　要：在刑法解释学领域,针对我国刑法275条的故意毁坏财物罪的"毁坏"内涵的"效用侵害说"正成为有力的学说;但是,"效用侵害说"的法哲学基础是不牢靠的:因为一方面该学说赖以立足的本体论诠释学本身是欠科学的,另一方面是由于刑法哲学与刑法解释学并非同一层次的问题。In the field of criminal law explanation, the＂Utility Infringement Doctrine＂ has becoming a strong effecting theory to delimit ＂destruction＂ of the article 275 in Chinese criminal code. But the philosophy basic of the＂Utility Infringement Doctrine＂ is not solid enough, because in one hand, the Ontological Hermeneutics itself is not scientific; On the other hand, philosophy of criminal law has not same essence to the criminal law explanation.

关 键 词：毁坏 效用侵害说 本体论诠释学 刑法诠释学 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]