陈鹤琴、福禄贝尔幼儿健身思想比较研究  

Comparative Study on the Child Body-building Thoughts between Chen Heqin and Frobel

作　　者：黄贵[1] 苏永骏[2] 

机构地区：[1]南通大学体育科学学院,江苏南通226007 [2]南通大学杏林学院,江苏南通226007

出　　处：《搏击（体育论坛）》2012年第7期3-5,共3页Sport Forum

基　　金：江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究:江苏近代幼儿体育教育思想的产生;发展及现代价值研究;编号:09SJB890006;江苏省社会科学基金项目;编号:10TYC006;江苏省教育科学"十一五"规划重点课题;编号:B-b/2009/01/039

摘　　要：文章运用文献资料法、专家访谈法、比较研究法和逻辑分析法等研究方法,对陈鹤琴和福禄贝尔幼儿健身思想进行对比与分析。陈鹤琴、福禄贝尔虽然生活在不同年代、不同国家,但都深受自然主义教育(体育)思想的影响,都创建了幼儿园并确立其保护儿童身心健康成长的教育任务,把游戏作为幼儿教育的主要内容,强调父母对幼儿游戏的关注,倡导集体性游戏。同时,由于二者幼儿健身思想形成的时代背景和理论基础不同,健身教育目的各具特色,对当时的教育改革带来了强大的冲击。陈鹤琴、福禄贝尔幼儿健身思想对贯彻《幼儿园教育指导纲要(试行)》和推进我国当前的幼儿园课程改革、素质教育仍具有重要的参考与价值借鉴价值。By the documental data, experts interview, comparative study and logic analysis, etc., the paper compares and analyses the child body-building thoughts between Chen Heqin and Frobel. Although Chen Heqin and Frobel lived in the different times and different countries, they were deeply affected by naturalist education （sports） thoughts. Both of them set up kindergartens and establish its education assignment which is protecting child＇s body and psychological health, think of game as the major content of children education, lay stress on the parents＇ following child game with interest, advocate collective games. At the same time, because of the different era background and theoretical basis of the forming of the two body-building thoughts, the body-building education purposes have their respective distinct characteristics. They had powerful impact on the education reform at that time. The two child body-building thoughts can still offer important reference to carry out Guiding Essentials of Kindergarten Education （Being Tried Out）, to promote the current kindergarten course reform and quality education in China.

关 键 词：陈鹤琴 福禄贝尔 幼儿健身思想 

分 类 号：G80[文化科学—运动人体科学]