陈鹤琴、蒙台梭利幼儿健身思想比较研究  

Comparative Study on the Child Body-building Thoughts between Chen Heqin and Montessori

作　　者：苏永骏[1] 黄贵[2] 

机构地区：[1]南通大学杏林学院,江苏南通226007 [2]南通大学体育科学学院,江苏南通226007

出　　处：《搏击（体育论坛）》2012年第8期14-16,共3页Sport Forum

基　　金：江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目:江苏近代幼儿体育教育思想的产生;发展及现代价值研究;编号:09SJB890006;江苏省社会科学基金项目;编号:10TYC006;江苏省教育科学"十一五"规划重点课题;编号:B-b/2009/01/039

摘　　要：文章运用文献资料法、专家访谈法、比较研究法和逻辑分析法等研究方法,对陈鹤琴和蒙台梭利幼儿健身思想进行对比与分析。陈鹤琴、蒙台梭利都出生于19世纪末,都深受自然主义教育(体育)思想的影响,都强调"以儿童为中心",重视游戏的教育价值,遵循相似的教学原则、设置相近的课程。同时,由于二者幼儿健身思想形成的时代背景和理论基础不同,健身教育目的和对集体性游戏的态度各不相同,对当时的教育改革带来了强大的冲击。二者幼儿健身思想对贯彻《幼儿园教育指导纲要(试行)》和推进中国当前的幼儿园课程改革、素质教育仍具有重要的参考与借鉴价值。By the documental data,investigation into experts,comparative study and logic analysis,etc.,the author compares and analyses the child body-building thoughts between Chen Heqin and Montessori.Chen Heqin and Montessori were both born in the end of 19th and deeply affected by naturalist education（sports） thoughts,so both of them put emphasis on ＂child-centered＂,attach importance to the education value of game,follow the similar teaching principle and set up similar courses.At the same time,because of the different era background and theoretical basis of the forming of the two body-building thoughts,the education purposes and the altitude to collective game are respectively different.They had powerful impact on the education reform at that time.The two child body-building thoughts can still offer important reference to carry out Guiding Essentials of Kindergarten Education（Being Tried Out）,to promote the current kindergarten course reform and quality education in China.

关 键 词：陈鹤琴 蒙台梭利 幼儿健身思想 

分 类 号：G80[文化科学—运动人体科学]