重温弗雷泽——简述西方人类学界关于弗雷泽的论争  

Frazer Revisited ——A Brief Review on Arguments about Frazer in the Western Anthropological Circles

作　　者：刘曼[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川成都610064 [2]湖南工业大学外国语学院,湖南株洲412008

出　　处：《中央民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第6期54-60,共7页Journal of Minzu University of China(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：湖南省教育厅科学研究项目<剑桥神话-仪式学派对中国神话的影响研究>(项目编号:12C0047)

摘　　要：弗雷泽在西方人类学史上的地位和影响颇为复杂,其人类学研究方法、研究内容、写作范式、作品价值、个人地位和影响等问题在西方人类学界曾引起广泛争议和讨论,而相关论争并不为国内学界所熟知。对20世纪60年代和80年代西方人类学界的两场关于弗雷泽的重要论争进行回顾和梳理,按图索骥,旨在以此表现"弗雷泽问题"的复杂性及其与人类学发展诸问题的关联性,有利于国内人类学研究的进一步深入展开。Frazer＇s status and influence are quite complicated in the history of Western anthropology. His research content, methodology, writing style, value of works, as well as his personal status and influence have aroused broad discussions and arguments in the Western anthropological circles, which are not fully known to Chinese scholars. Aiming at presenting the complexity of Frazer＇s problem and its relevance to the problems in the development of anthropology, the author attempts to look back on and tease out the two important debates related to Frazer in the Western anthropological circles in 1960＇s and 1980＇s respectively in the hope of supplying helpful references for further studies on anthropology.

关 键 词：弗雷泽 人类学革命 民族志写作 

分 类 号：C912.4[经济管理]