检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈细田[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学,武汉430072
出 处:《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》2012年第5期94-99,共6页Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:实质刑法观作为行为功利主义伦理学在刑法理论中的应用,它正视立法和司法事实,有助于人们理解刑法的目的,是对只抽象谈论刑法的道义论刑法观的超越。但实质刑法观自身存在一定局限性:由于没有区分直觉思维层面和批判思维层面,进而混淆了立法者和司法者的角色;只考虑到对刑法规范便宜行事,没有顾及遵守刑法规范所能带来的长远效果,违反了罪行法定原则,最终背离了功利主义宗旨;过分注重结果,忽视正义,具有非正义性。As an application of act-utilitarianism to criminal law theory, view of substantive criminal law faces up to the fact of legislation and justice and can help us understand the purpose of criminal law. It has surpassed deontology which only talks about criminal law abstractly. But it has the following limits. Owing to not distinguish the level of intuitive thinking from the level of critical thinking, it confuses the two roles of legislator and justice; it only pays attention to the flexible application of the rules of criminal law, not to consider the long-term results of abiding by the rules of criminal law, so it violates the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime; and it emphasizes results excessively and neglects justice, thus it has the feature of injustice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15