超越与局限:对实质刑法观的伦理学分析  被引量:1

Transcendences and Limits:An Ethical Analysis on View of Substantive Criminal Law

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈细田[1] 

机构地区:[1]武汉大学,武汉430072

出  处:《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》2012年第5期94-99,共6页Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)

摘  要:实质刑法观作为行为功利主义伦理学在刑法理论中的应用,它正视立法和司法事实,有助于人们理解刑法的目的,是对只抽象谈论刑法的道义论刑法观的超越。但实质刑法观自身存在一定局限性:由于没有区分直觉思维层面和批判思维层面,进而混淆了立法者和司法者的角色;只考虑到对刑法规范便宜行事,没有顾及遵守刑法规范所能带来的长远效果,违反了罪行法定原则,最终背离了功利主义宗旨;过分注重结果,忽视正义,具有非正义性。As an application of act-utilitarianism to criminal law theory, view of substantive criminal law faces up to the fact of legislation and justice and can help us understand the purpose of criminal law. It has surpassed deontology which only talks about criminal law abstractly. But it has the following limits. Owing to not distinguish the level of intuitive thinking from the level of critical thinking, it confuses the two roles of legislator and justice; it only pays attention to the flexible application of the rules of criminal law, not to consider the long-term results of abiding by the rules of criminal law, so it violates the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime; and it emphasizes results excessively and neglects justice, thus it has the feature of injustice.

关 键 词:道义论 行为功利主义 规则功利主义 实质刑法观 

分 类 号:D924[政治法律—刑法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象