检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋静[1] 周长城[1] 仲兆平[1] 邹平[2] 王林[1]
机构地区:[1]东南大学能源与环境学院,南京210096 [2]云南大学工程技术研究院,昆明650091
出 处:《环境工程学报》2012年第12期4559-4565,共7页Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering
基 金:国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(2007AA06Z312);国家自然科学基金资助项目(51168046)
摘 要:对生物膜填料塔对模拟烟气和电厂烟气的净化效果进行了实验研究。实验对比分析了在相同的实验条件下生物膜填料塔对不同烟气中SO2和NOx的净化效率。实验结果表明,在循环液温度在24~35℃、空床停留时间(EBRT)为60 s、喷淋量为8~10 L/h、脱硫塔的pH为0.8~1.5、脱氮塔的pH为7.5~8.0的条件下,生物膜填料塔对模拟烟气和电厂烟气中SO2的净化效率都很高,但模拟烟气条件下的总脱氮率的平均值为80%,而在电厂烟气条件下只有35%。经分析认为,脱氮率产生差异的主要原因是电厂烟气中杂质的影响,以及烟气中氧气含量的不同,同时因为生长条件不同从而驯化出的微生物群体组成也不同。The removal of sulfur dioxide (SOL) and nitrogen oxides (NO) from simulated gas streams and flue gas was studied. Removal efficiency of SO2 and NOx in different gas was compared and analyzed under the same conditions. It is indicated that, with empty bed residence time (EBRT) of 60 s, cycling fluid of 8 - 10 L/ h, cycling fluid temperature of 24 - 35℃ , cycling fluid' s pH value of desulfurizing tower of 0.8 - 1.5 and deni- trification tower pH of 7.5 - 8.0, the biological film packed tower showed a high removal efficiency of simulated gas streams and flue gas purification of SO/. Average rate of the total nitrogen removal efficiency of simulated gas streams was 80% , and removal rate of flue gas was 35%. By analysis, the main reasons of the discrepancy of the nitrogen removal efficiency were the impurities and the oxygen concentration in flue gas. At the same time, different micro populations which were acclimated under different growth conditions can be another reason.
分 类 号:X701[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.242.144