检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李力生[1] 郭华星[1] 潘巧丽[1] 王泓午[1]
机构地区:[1]中国.天津中医药大学人文管理学院,300193
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2012年第12期1827-1829,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:国家科技支撑计划课题:中医干预心理性亚健康状态的前瞻性队列研究(课题编号:2006BAI13B05-2)
摘 要:目的通过面部表情反馈实验,探索面部表情的调节对心理亚健康的影响。方法运用亚健康自评量表和症状自评量表(SCL-90)进行问卷调查筛选,选取21名被试通过匹配分成实验组1、实验组2、控制组进行面部表情反馈实验研究。结果实验组1与控制组的后侧比较,实验组1在躯体化,人际敏感,焦虑和精神病性上显著低于控制组(t=-2.25,-2.45,-2.42,-2.39;P<0.05);实验组2与控制组的后侧比较,实验组2在躯体化上,人际敏感和焦虑显著低于控制组(t=-2.06,-2.16,-2.23;P<0.05);而实验组1和实验组2相比没有显著差异。结论面部表情反馈对大学生心理亚健康有明显的影响。Objective Through facial feedback experiment,to explore the impact of the regulation of facial expressions on sub-health.Methods Using sub-health self-rating scale and SCL-90 for screening questionnaire,and selected 21 subjects by matching were divided into experimental group 1,the experimental group2 and control group,they were carried out experimental study of facial expression feedback.Results The experimental group1 were significantly lower than the control group on somatization,interpersonal sensitivity,anxiety and psychosis(t=-2.25,-2.45,-2.42,-2.39;P0.05,P0.05);Experimental group 2 were significantly lower than control group on somatization,interpersonal sensitivity and anxiety(t=-2.06,-2.16,-2.23;P0.05);while there were no significant differences between the experimental group1 and experimental group 2.Conclusion Facial expressions feedback has a significant impact on sub-health.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200