隐私权视野下的网上公开裁判文书之限  

Restraint of Right to Privacy on Publication of Case Judgments Online

作　　者：黄忠[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院 [2]四川医事卫生法治研究中心

出　　处：《北方法学》2012年第6期87-94,共8页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"个人信息的民法保护研究"(项目编号07CFX019);四川医事卫生法治研究中心项目"突发公共卫生事件报道中的隐私权保护"(项目编号YF10-Q02);重庆市第四中级人民法院项目"司法与民意沟通机制研究"的科研成果

摘　　要：裁判文书的上网是落实审判公开的一项有力措施,但其对隐私权的威胁亦不容忽视。裁判文书的全文上网原则上应预先获得当事人的同意,当然,若裁判文书涉及公共利益,则隐私权也应受到限制。但因公共利益的需要而将裁判文书上网时,仍应对具有可识别性的个人信息和其他重要信息予以保密。被害人、证人、未成年人的隐私权应予特殊保护。调解书原则上不应通过网络公开。It is an effective measure to promote open trial by publicizing case judgments online though it will also threat the right to privacy. The whole text of case judgment cannot be publicized online unless the consent of parties is obtained in advance. Nevertheless, the right to privation should also be restrained by pub- lic interest. When the case judgment is publicized online required by public interest, certain identifiable per- sonal data and other vital information should be properly protected. Privacy of the victim, witness and minors should be protected particularly. The agreement of mediation generally should not be publicized online.

关 键 词：裁判文书上网 审判公开 隐私权 个人信息 

分 类 号：DF51[政治法律—民商法学]