检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国.江苏省无锡市精神卫生中心,214151
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2012年第11期1618-1619,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的比较度洛西汀与西酞普兰治疗脑卒中后抑郁焦虑共病的疗效。方法对73例脑卒中后抑郁焦虑共病患者随机分为度洛西汀组和西酞普兰组,疗程6周。于治疗前及治疗1、2、4、6周采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评定疗效,用副反应量表(TESS)评定副反应。结果治疗6周后两组HAMD和HAMA评分均显著下降(P<0.01),治疗1周末度洛西汀组疗效优于西酞普兰组(t=-2.312,-2.278;P均<0.05);治疗6周后度洛西汀组有效率为88.88%,西酞普兰组为86.48%,两组疗效差异无统计学意义(t=0.382,P>0.05);两组不良反应的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论度洛西汀治疗脑卒中后抑郁焦虑疗效与西酞普兰相似,起效时间快于西酞普兰。Objective To compare the efficacy of duloxetine and citalopram in the treatment of post-stroke comorbid anxiety and depression.Methods A total of 73 patients meeting with criterion for post-stroke comorbid anxiety and depression were randomly divided into duloxetine group and citalopram group for 6 weeks treatment.They were assessed by Hamilton rating scale for depression(HAMD),Hamilton rating scale for anxiety(HAMA)and Treatment emergent symptoms scale(TESS)before and after 1,2,4 and 6 weeks treatment.Results The scores of HAMD and HAMA decreased significantly after 6 weeks treatment for two groups(P0.01).At the end of week 1,efficacy was superior in duloxetine group than in citalopram group(t=-2.312,-2.278;P0.05).Response was found in 32(88.88%)patients in duloxetine group and 32(86.48%)patients in citalopram group at the end of 6 weeks treatment(t=0.382,P0.05).There was no significantly differences in adverse events between two groups(P0.05).Conclusion Duloxetine has the similar efficacy as citalopram in the treatment of post-stroke comorbid anxiety and depression,but the former takes effects quicker than the latter in the treatment.
关 键 词:脑卒中后抑郁焦虑共病 度洛西汀 西酞普兰 汉密尔顿焦虑量表 汉密尔顿抑郁量表
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145