心理干预对飞行人员应对方式和社会支持的影响  

Effect of Psychological Intervention on Coping Style and Social Support of Aircrew

作　　者：田静[1] 李丽[1] 贲学芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国.北京军区北戴河疗养院第三疗养区航空生理心理中心,秦皇岛066100

出　　处：《中国健康心理学杂志》2012年第11期1690-1692,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology

摘　　要：目的探讨心理干预对飞行人员应对方式和社会支持的影响。方法选取来院疗养的119名军事飞行人员,随机分为干预组和对照组,对干预组实施心理干预,对照组不进行任何心理干预,采用社会支持量表及应对方式问卷对心理干预前后两组飞行人员进行测评,并对干预前后的结果进行比较。结果①心理干预前两组飞行人员应对方式和社会支持量表得分无统计学差异(t=0.12,0.74,-0.30,0.67,-0.37,-0.67;P>0.05);②心理干预后干预组飞行人员的积极应对维度(t=2.67,P<0.01)、主观支持度(t=2.85,P<0.01)、对支持利用度的得分(t=2.45,P<0.05)及社会支持总分(t=2.82,P<0.01)高于干预前,消极应对维度得分低于干预前(t=4.11,P<0.01),对照组前后测的各量表得分无显著变化;③干预组心理干预后飞行人员的积极应对维度(t=2.45,P<0.05)、主观支持度(t=2.90,P<0.01)、对支持利用度得分(t=2.61,P<0.01)及社会支持总分(t=3.42,P<0.01)均高于同时期的对照组,消极应对维度得分低于对照组(t=-2.72,P<0.01)。结论心理干预能改善飞行人员的应对方式,提高飞行人员的社会支持水平。Objectives To study the effect of psychological intervention on coping style and social support of aircrew.Methods A total of 119 military aircrew were randomly divided into intervention group and control group.The psychological intervention was performed on intervention group,and no psychological intervention was performed on control group.Social Support Rating Scale（SSRS）and Trait Coping Style Questionnaire（TCSQ） were used to observe the effect of psychological intervention on the aircrew.Results ①There were no significant differences between two groups in SSRS and TCSQ before psychological intervention（t=0.12,0.74,-0.30,0.67,-0.37,-0.67;P0.05）.②After intervention,the scores of positive coping styles（t=2.67,P0.01）,subjective support（t=2.85,P0.01）,utilization ratio of support（t=2.45,P0.05）and total scale of social support（t=2.82,P0.01）were significantly higher than those before intervention,and the score of negative coping styles was significantly lower than that before intervention（t=4.11,P0.01）.there were no significant differences between pretest and posttest in control group score（t=0.32,-0.57,0.22,0.66,0.34,1.27;P0.05）.③After intervention,the scores of positive coping styles（t=2.45,P0.05）,subjective support（t=2.90,P0.01）,utilization ratio of support（t=2.61,P0.01）and total scale of social support（t=3.42,P0.01）were significantly higher than those in control group.and the score of negative coping styles was significantly lower than that in control group（t=-2.72,P0.01）.Conclusion Psychological intervention can improve coping style and social support of the aircrew.

关 键 词：心理干预 飞行人员 应对方式 社会支持 

分 类 号：R195.4[医药卫生—卫生统计学]