检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩长江[1]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院财政贸易系,河北石家庄050011
出 处:《经济与管理》2012年第12期37-40,共4页Economy and Management
摘 要:当前,学术界对我国贫富分化问题特别是城乡收入差距问题的研究越来越多,并取得了可喜成果。但在现有研究中亦存在一些不容忽视的问题,具体而言就是存在着或以"不患寡但患不均"的传统观念来评判我国的改革成果,或生搬硬套西方所谓基尼系数过分渲染我国贫富差距等倾向。因此有必要对"基尼系数排行"滥用和"倒U假说"误导予以批判,并在揭示我国城乡贫富分化现象的本质和症结所在的基础上给出解决之策。In the recent years, academic circle researches literatures more and more on the polarization between the rich and the poor and on the expansion of income gap between the urban and rural areas in China have been ever increasing and get brilliant achievements,while there can not be ignored problems, such as the value based inclination in academic discussion, judge the reform achievements of China with traditional idea of "Worry for uneven distribution instead of poor"; over- sensationalize the existing gap with the Western Gini coefficient mechanically,or take an irresponsible attitude of let things drift. In the paper,criticism to the misuse and misleading of Gini Ranking and Inverted U Hypothesis is given, and based on which the author reveals the essence and cruxes of the polarization phenomenon between urban and rural in China, and finally put foreword three major policy suggestions for solving the problems in the future.
关 键 词:“三农”政策 城乡收入差距 基尼系数 “倒U假说”
分 类 号:F014.4[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.20