检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津医科大学眼科中心,天津市300384 [2]滨州医学院附属医院眼科
出 处:《眼科新进展》2012年第12期1161-1164,共4页Recent Advances in Ophthalmology
摘 要:目的评价无眼征的Graves病(Graves disease,GD)患者的眼表损害以及泪膜功能变化,了解眼表炎症在干眼发生机理中的作用。方法本研究选取38例(76眼)无眼征的GD患者与30名(60眼)正常人。记录睑裂高度、眼球突出度、眼表疾病指数(ocular surface disease index,OSDI)、泪液分泌试验、泪膜破裂时间、角膜荧光素染色及结膜印迹细胞检查结果,并将两组数据进行比较。结果 OSDI得分:GD组为(43.34±10.32)分,对照组为(22.56±11.21)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。泪液分泌量:GD组为(13.2±7.1)mm,对照组为(22.4±4.5)mm,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。泪膜破裂时间GD组为(7.2±2.1)s,对照组为(10.4±2.9)s,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。角膜荧光素染色:GD组阳性20眼,对照组6眼,差异有统计学意义(P=0.016)。结膜印记细胞学检查:GD组中0级26眼,1级23眼,2级17眼,3级6眼;正常对照组中,0级39眼,1级13眼,2级6眼,3级2眼,两组分布差异有统计学意义(P=0.008)。两组睑裂高度及眼球突出度差异无统计学意义(t值分别为0.482、-0.357,P值分别为0.632、0.723)。结论无眼征GD患者眼表有损害并存在干眼的表现,可能与眼表炎症有所关联。Objective To evaluate the ocular surface damage and the changes of tear film function in Graves disease (GD) patients without eye symptoms, and investi- gate the function of ocular inflammation in the pathogenesis of dry eye. Methods A total of 38 patients(76 eyes) with GD without eye symptoms and 30 healthy controls(60 eyes) were included in this study. The palpebral fissure height, degree of proptosis, ocu- lar surface disease index( OSDI), Schirmer I tear test,break-up time( BUT), corneal flu- orescence staining( FL), and conjunctival impression cytology(IC) were assessed. The results were compared between the patient and the control groups. Results The OS- DI score was 43.34 ± 10.32 in the GD group and 22.56 ± 11.21 in the control group, there was significant difference (P 〈 0.01 ). The value of Schirmer I test was( 13.2 ± 7. 1 ) mm in the GD group and ( 22.4 ± 4.5 )mm in the control group, there was significant difference(P 〈 0.01 ). BUT was(7.2 ± 2. 1 ) s in the GD group and ( 10.4 ± 2.9 ) s in the control group,there was significant difference (P 〈 0.01 ). In the corneal fluorescence staining test,20 eyes were positive in the GD group and 5 eyes in the control group, there was statistical difference(P = 0.016). Conjunctival impress cytology showed grade 0 was in 26 eyes(36. l1% ),grade 1 in 23 eyes(31.94% ),grade 2 in 17 eyes(23.61% ), grade 3 in 6 eyes(8.33% ) in GD group,whereas grade 0 in 39 eyes(65.00% ) ,grade 1 in 13 eves(21.67% ). grade 2 in 6 eyes (10.00%). grade 3 in 2 eyes (3.33%)in control group ,there was significant difference(P = 0.008 ). There was no statistical difference in interpalpebral distance and protosis between two groups ( t = 0.482, - 0.357 ;P = 0. 532,0. 723 ). Conclusion Dry eye and ocular surface damage appear in GD without eye symptoms, which may be associated with the ocular surface inflammation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

