检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟翌[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学光华法学院
出 处:《新疆社会科学》2012年第5期88-94,151-152,共7页Social Sciences in Xinjiang
基 金:国家社科基金重大招标项目"健全权力运行制约与监督机制研究"(09&ZD007)的阶段性研究成果;教育部博士研究生学术新人奖资助
摘 要:要实现比例原则的司法适用,需首先为其在宪法文本中找到规范基础。比例原则的本质应是"公民与国家之间权利义务的对称性",由此提出并论证以中国宪法第33条为比例原则的规范基础。法院可在判决中,通过该条款进行合宪性法律解释,为运用比例原则说明理由。以此为起点,比例原则的司法适用还有待于推动进一步的宪政改革,明确比例原则的司法技术定位,以及案例指导制度、司法解释制度的跟进。The judicial power is relatively weak in China,asking the court to apply the principle of proportionality which has higher review intensity than the principle of rationality is more difficult to realize the principle of proportionality judicial application.The beginning should be finding the fundament in the constitution text.The essence of this principle is the symmetry of the rights and obligations,from this basement,we propose and prove the 33rd of Chinese constitution Text to be the proportionality principle fundament.In its ruling, through the application of this article,the court may take the constitutionality of legal interpretation to support the use of Proportionality principle.Beginning from this basement,the judicial review through the proportionality principle still depends on the further constitutional reform,clarification of the judicial technique definition and the advancement of the case guidance system as well as judicial interpretation system.
关 键 词:比例原则 宪法规范基础 目的解释方法 权利义务对称性 合宪性法律解释
分 类 号:D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.32