环境侵权责任的行为责任性质之论证及其规范意义  

Demonstration on the Nature of the Acts Responsibility of Environmental Tort Liability and Its Normative Sense

作　　者：刘超[1] 

机构地区：[1]华侨大学法学院,福建泉州362021

出　　处：《中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第6期31-39,136,共9页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"环境侵权救济诉求下的环保法庭研究:制度绩效与内在机理"(10YJC820071);中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目"环境政策与环境法律的协同机制研究"(JB-SK1140)

摘　　要：侵权责任有结果责任与行为责任的二分,当前环境侵权责任制度秉持了结果责任的理念与逻辑。不同于民事侵权行为对于私权的直接侵害,环境侵权在致害机理上具有间接性、潜伏性、复杂性和多元性等特性。环境侵权责任应当不再局限于结果责任理念展开制度设计,新型的环境侵权责任应当定性为行为责任,责任认定的核心应聚焦于行为本身而不再注重于行为的后果。理论转向的实践功能在于,通过制度完善使得环境标准成为认定环境侵权行为可谴责性的关键法律环节,还可以突破环境公益诉讼制度构建中的诸多瓶颈。Tort liability can be divided into result liability and act liability.Environmental tort liability reflects the ideas and logic of result liability.A large number of environmental violations do not lead to personal injury or property damage,but cause harm to environment.Traditional environmental violation is a direct violation of individual rights,but environmental violations have the characteristics of indirectness,complexity and diversity.Moreover,because environmental right has not been regulated in our legal system,there are some controversies in the relief of environmental right.Therefore,environmental tort liability should be classified as act liability.Liability should focus on the act itself rather than the consequences of the act.Normative functions of act liability are as follows:Laws should be revised,and environmental standards should be the key legal factor to identify the condemnation of environmental violations,thus solving many problems in the construction of environmental public interest litigation.

关 键 词：环境侵权责任 结果责任 行为责任 环境标准 规范意义 

分 类 号：D912.601[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]