财产罪的保护法益探究  

Research on Legal Interests of Property Crime

作　　者：冯春萍[1] 张红昌[1] 

机构地区：[1]海南师范大学政法学院,海南海口571158

出　　处：《法学杂志》2012年第12期45-49,共5页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：财产罪的保护法益之上存在所有权说、本权说与占有说的对立。所有权说、本权说存在保护范围过于狭窄的弊端,占有说又存在保护范围过于宽泛的缺陷,处于本权说与占有说之间的修正说成为主流立场。占有原为所有权的权能之一,但随着社会经济的发展,它已具有独立的价值和地位。不过,并非所有的占有侵害都成立财产罪,基于占有说的立场必须对财产犯的保护范围作出适当限制以合理划定财产罪的成立范围。合理对抗本权的占有是我国财产罪的保护法益。There are three different arguments about protection of legal interests of property crime, namely, the theories of ownership, right and possession. The theories of ownership and right have the shortcoming of the narrow scope of protection, while the theory of possession has the opposite shortcoming. Nevertheless, the revising theory that is between the two was accepted by the majority. The word ＂possession＂ , which is one of the functions of own- ership, has its independent value and position with the social economic development. However, not all the infringe- ment of possession constitutes the property crime. The theory of possession argues that it should limit the protection scope of property crime. The proper possession against fight is the protection of legal interests of property crime by China＇s criminal law.

关 键 词：财产罪 犯罪客体 占有财产秩序 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]