全球经济失衡:中国的位置和治理参与抉择  

Global Economic Imbalance:China's Position and Governance Choice

作　　者：丁重[1] 邓可斌[2] 

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学粤商研究中心,广东广州510006 [2]广东外语外贸大学财经学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《国际经贸探索》2012年第12期27-38,共12页International Economics and Trade Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目(09&ZD021);国家社科基金青年项目(12CJY047);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(12YJC790032);广东省哲学社会科学青年项目(GD11YYJ02);广东省教育厅人文社会科学研究重大攻关项目(11ZGXM63005)

摘　　要：影响全球经济失衡的因素目前被归结为金融发展和国际分工优势上的差异。但这些因素并不完全是外生决定的,在不同国家或地区,这些因素之间的彼此联系也完全不同。基于这些经验事实,我们构建了一个初步的理论模型分析框架。研究发现:金融发展理论和国际分工优势理论在解释全球经济失衡问题方面都存在着缺陷;一国技术与金融创新能力、所处的国际竞争位置和其在治理全球经济失衡问题中的政策选择有着紧密的关系。结合中国经济发展特点和所属阶段,中国在治理全球经济失衡问题方面应采取以技术创新为主、以有助于技术创新的金融创新能力提升和国际经济组织治理为辅的模式,而不能仅着眼于治理金融失衡或分工失衡。The influencing factors of global economic imbalance are summarized as the difference between financial development and international labor division advantage. But these factors are not entirely exogenous, and the relationship between these factors is different in different countries. The research finds that the theory of financial development and the theory of international labor division advantage can not explain the global imbalance well, and a country＇s technical and financial innovation ability, international competitive position and policy choice of governance in the global imbalance have a close relationship. Considering the characteristics and stage of Chinese economic development, in the governance of global imbalance, China should depend mainly on technical innovation, supplemented by the promotion of financial innovation ability benefiting technical innovation and the governance of international economic organization, but can not only focus on the governance of financial imbalance and labor division imbalance.

关 键 词：全球经济失衡 技术创新 国际分工 金融深化 

分 类 号：F114.3[经济管理—国际贸易]