法治与性别平等:论《〈婚姻法〉司法解释(三)》第五条之法理缺陷  

Rule of Law and Gender Equality——Deficiencies in Judicial Interpretation of Marriage Law Article V.

作　　者：刘祎[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北大学,湖北武汉430062

出　　处：《山东女子学院学报》2012年第6期44-46,63,共4页Journal of Shandong Women＇s University

摘　　要：《〈婚姻法〉司法解释(三)》第五条之内容以形式中立的法律固化了男性的事实优势,侵害了女性尤其是弱势女性在婚姻家庭中的权益,其立法理念是男权式的,即只考量到经济因素,而忽视了女性为婚姻家庭所提供的非物质性贡献,导致的结果是法律的性别歧视。其解决之道是将性别平等的意识贯彻到法制环境中,藉由法律实现男女两性的实质平等。It stabilized mankind＇ s superiority factually by neutral law that judicial interpretation of marriage law article V. The doctrine of lawmaking which taking singly account of economic factors, not having idea of non - economic contributions devoted by women was patriarchal. It weakened rights of disadvantaged women in family. As a result, marriage law gave birth to sex discrimination. How to solve this problem is to imply gender equality into legal system.

关 键 词：《婚姻法》 女性主义法学 性别平等 法律社会学 

分 类 号：D923.9[政治法律—民商法学]