“实验主义”还是“辩证唯物论”——新文化同人:由思想方法论差异到政见分歧  

“Experimentalism" or “Dialectical Materialism"——New Culture Colleagues: from the Differences of Methodology of Thinking to the Divergences of Political Views

作　　者：吴志娟[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学中国近代史研究所 [2]湖北大学马克思主义学院,讲师武汉430062

出　　处：《中共党史研究》2012年第12期60-69,共10页CPC History Studies

摘　　要：五四新文化运动时期,新文化同人在探索如何解决中国问题、如何改造社会的过程中,接受了来自西方的两种不同的思想方法论:"实验主义"与"辩证唯物论"。他们对这两种思想方法论的不同理解、不同偏好以及"实验主义"与"辩证唯物论"自身的理论差异,使其在分析中国社会问题时产生诸多政见分歧,并由此形成不同的政治主张:提倡实验主义者主张改造中国社会需"一点一滴"的改良演进;提倡辩证唯物论者主张改造中国社会需"一反一正"的政治革命。本文在梳理、阐述这两种思想方法论之差异的基础上,分析新文化同人如何运用它们分析中国问题,如何产生不同的政治见解与主张。During the period of New Culture Movement, new culture colleagues accepted two different methodologies of thinking from the West, ＂experimentalism＂ and ＂dialectical materialism＂, in the process of exploring how to solve China＇ s problems and transform the society. For their different understandings and preferences to those two methodologies of thinking and their own theoretical differences, they raised lots of divergences of political views and formed different political ideas while analyzing China＇ s social problems ： the advocator of experimental- ism favored Chinese society needed an improved evolution ＂bit by bit＂ and the advocator of dialectical materialism favored Chinese society needed a political revolution of ＂positive and negative＂. Based on organizing and elaborating the differences of those two methodologies, this paper analyses new culture colleagues how to use the differences to analyze China＇ s problems and how to raise different political views and stands.

关 键 词：实验主义 辩证唯物论 思想方法论 差异 政见分歧 

分 类 号：D092[政治法律—政治学] K261[历史地理—历史学]