唯物史观史学与实验主义史学的冲突--以李季为个案的考察  

The Conflicts between Historiography of Historical Materialism and Historiography of Experimentalism——A Case Study of Li Ji

作　　者：陈峰[1] 汤艳萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学文史哲研究院

出　　处：《中共党史研究》2012年第12期70-77,共8页CPC History Studies

基　　金：教育部人文社科项目“20世纪中国马克思主义史学的学术地位研究”(10YJA770051);山东大学人文社会科学重大研究项目“西方历史计量学与中国本土化研究”(12RWZD12);山东大学儒学高等研究院学术研究项目“近代马克思主义史家的儒学观研究”的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：在民国时期唯物史观史学与实验主义史学的冲突和争锋中,曾为中共早期成员的李季担当了重要角色。李季撰著《胡适中国哲学史大纲批判》一书,对胡适的思想史研究发动系统清算,开启了马克思主义的思想史研究路径。李季的《古史辨的解毒剂》等系列文章对以顾颉刚为首的"古史辨"派的学术路向进行反思和纠偏,为古史与社会史汇流推波助澜。具有托派背景的李季的上述作为,显示了1949年前唯物史观史学构成的复杂性。In the conflicts and fights between historiography of historical materialism and historiography of experimentalism during the period of the Republic of China, Li Ji, the early member of the CPC, played an important role. The book ＂Critique of Hu Shi＇ s Outline of Chinese Philosophy History＂ written by Li Ji systematically exposed and condemned Hu Shi＇ s thinking history research and opened the Marxism thinking history research path. Li Ji＇ s series of articles carried out reflections and corrections to another academic school headed by Gu Jiegang and promoted the convergence of ancient history and social history. Li Ji＇ s behaviors showed the complexity of the composition of historiography of historical materialism before 1949.

关 键 词：唯物史观 实验主义 社会史 李季 胡适 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]