两种针刺配穴方法治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的比较  

Comparison of Two Methods in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis of Vertebral Artery Type

作　　者：王源 

机构地区：[1]四川省九寨沟县中藏医院,四川九寨沟623400

出　　处：《针灸临床杂志》2012年第11期26-27,共2页Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion

摘　　要：目的:比较两种针刺配穴方法对椎动脉型颈椎病的治疗效果。方法:选择该病患者48例,随机分为传统针刺疗法组(对照组)24例和"四天"穴针刺疗法组(实验组)24例。对照组以颈夹脊穴为主选穴,配合百会、风池、四神聪、外关等穴。实验组选穴以"四天"穴(天牖、天容、天窗、天鼎)为主。观察记录并发症及恢复情况,并随访半年。结果:两组疗效比较有显著统计学差别(P<0.05),实验组疗效明显优于对照组。两组患者治愈例数构成比的比较有显著统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗组较好。结论:针刺"四天"穴治疗椎动脉型颈椎病临床疗效满意。Objective：To compare the efficacy of two acupoint methods in the treatment of Cervical Spondylosis of Vertebral Artery Type.Methods：48 patients with Cervical Spondylosis of Vertebral Artery Type were collected and were randomly divided into two groups： 24 cases were treated by the neck Jiaji-based selection of points,with one hundred,the wind pool,Sishencong,Waiguan and other points（control group）,while 24 cases were treated by Selection of points to the ＂Sitian＂ the main point（Tianyou,Tianrong,Tianchuang,Tianding）（experiment group）.Observe complications and recovery.The follow-up time was 6 months.Results：Between the two groups,there was a statistically significant difference in therapeutic effect（P0.05）,the experimental group was more significant.There were markedly differences in the constituent rate of cured cases between the two groups（P0.05）,the experimental group was highly raised.Conclusion：There is a good clinical efficacy in the treatment of cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type by acupuncturing ＂Sitian＂ point.

关 键 词：椎动脉型颈椎病 针刺疗法 “四天”穴 夹脊穴 

分 类 号：R246.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]